How responsible are those people and companies inventing the latest mobile devices and wireless networks?
What if these devices and wireless networks are like cigarettes: after prolonged use some people get seriously ill?
I took my time investigating:
- "Results from present studies on use of mobile phones for >10 years give a consistent pattern of
increased risk for acoustic neuroma and glioma (brain tumors)". This study of Lennart Hardell & Co investigated two cohort studies and 16 case control studies. The paper was published in April 2007 in the Occupational and Environmental Medicine Journal.
- "... found no evidence for an association between tumor risk and cellular telephone use among either short-term or long-term users." A Danish study inspecting adults and their use of mobile phones in 21 years time period. Published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
- "Children should not place computers on their laps while they are using
wireless Internet connections because of potential health risks" . Says professor Lawrie Challis, who also leads the committee on mobile phone safety research in UK.
- "Blue Angels mobile phones for children should not be provided by teleoperators and dealers, since their SAR rate is above 0,6 W/kg . Children are recommended to use corded phones in their daily communication. (Translation from German) This statement was made by the German Government Bureau of Radiation Protection (Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz). Similar concern was expressed here.
These kind of results, although controversial, make me...worried. Remember: our generation started using mobile phones when we were adults. Younger generations start using mobile devices and wireless networks in their early childhood and they will be exposed to various sorts of radiation much longer than our generation.
What does this has to do with ethics and innovation? The following incident 'woke me up':
In February 2007 I was attending a seminar in Helsinki and was listening to one of the inventors of Apache Mobile Web Server. In terms of ARPU this kind of server in the mobile phone means more traffic and more income from data transfer to operators. From ubiquitous computing perspective user may carry all services with himself/herself (in the mobile phone) and have them easily accessible.
During his presentation I asked that inventor, an engineer, whether he and his partners have
thought about implications on health of people using that server in
their mobile phone (in their pocket) 24/7. He did not answer my
question, more like he continued to explain how fantastic technologically this
invention theirs is.
I find this kind of behaviour (and answer) irresponsible. These mobile pocket servers will most likely multiply the amount of radiation to the tissues of the user. Is it really ethical to innovate if we do not pay close attention to possible health effects already in the invention phase? How much have we tested these services' health effects before launching to market / releasing in a community? What does sustainability mean in the mobile business? I am glad to hear your comments about these topics.
UPDATE 13th January 2008: Check also the next part of this discussion: "Ethics of Innovation 2 - Recommendations for Sustainable Mobile Inventions".
After word: There has been some good 'ethics of innovation' discussion before. Please, look at here and here and here.
Recent Comments